Hi, There was a known bug in OO.o calc that has apparently been fixed in upstream. However, it seems like RedHat *decided* that the bug should be kept broken in redhat releases, based on unclear "Intelectual Property" claims. It was then set as "closed", but the bug is still there: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=146883 I have little law knowlegde, but I can't imagine how breaking an OPEN SOURCE software can protect redhat from IP claims, and they don't give enough information in their replies to explain it. I wonder if anyone on this list with more experience could take a look at the bugzilla dicussion and give us some extra light about what they mean. Thanks, -- ------------------------------------------------------------------ Gustavo Seabra Graduate Student Chemistry Dept. Kansas State University Registered Linux user number 381680 ------------------------------------------------------------------ If at first you don't succeed... ...skydiving is not for you.
