Re: XFree86 gone from Fedora Core? WHY!?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Timothy Murphy wrote:

| Peter Boy wrote:
|
|>> However, in my experience Xorg is significantly inferior to
|>> XFree86.
|>
|> Strange, currently the code base is quite similar.
|
|
| Note that I said "in my experience". The "ati" driver seems to have
| been changed in undocumented ways.
|
~    My main gripe is that nvidia support seems to have vanished.  I
know that people want the software to progress and that some things
inevitably break in compatibility, but I would think that video
support is the very *last* thing you'd want to break, considering the
fact that if your video breaks, it's pretty much "game over".

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3-nr1 (Windows XP)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFAsRAHgF2j46xNYOYRAoroAJ4ibAOO48s2uKnNRrJmU5Zw49yZSgCeMQB/
iCI40zueCXwyFGfL9h4Z69s=
=SDBh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux