Re: lvm is needed by (installed) mkinitrd-3.5.14-1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2004-02-18 at 01:05, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Jim Popovitch (jimpop@xxxxxxxxx) said: 
> > > > But can't you have an existing initrd without mkinitrd? 
> > 
> > So, you think that you need mkinitrd to boot a initrd' kernel?
> 
> To make a new initrd when you upgrade your kernel, yes.

AHHH, but in order to be that far down the road, you would already have
booted your lvm root partition, thus negating the need to require lvm as
a dependency of mkinitrd.  So, since you seem to be defending the
practice, why again is lvm a dependency of mkinitrd?

Chicken != Egg.  ;)

-Jim P.






[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux