Re: pam config

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Bevin, Michael,

Thanks very much. Makes perfect sense.

Best,

Adam Kosmin


Michael Kearey (mutk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
" Adam Kosmin wrote:
" >Hello everyone,
" >
" >I'm looking at my pam configuration and noticed something odd in
" >/etc/pam.d/other
" >
" >Each line contains a reference to a path that does not exist. For
" >example:
" >
" >auth	required	/lib/security/$ISA/pam_deny.so
" >
" >My filesystem does not contain a directory path of /lib/security/$ISA so
" >I can't help but become curious.
" 
" I am not entirely sure, but this is a variable that may be set for 
" different paths to the pam modules.  Maybe for different archs ? ie 32 
" and 64 bit varieties of pam modules.
" 
" I googled and found a reference and it seems the $ISA is for this 
" purpose...
" 
" Cheers,
" Michael
" 
" 
" 
" -- 
" fedora-list mailing list
" fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
" To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
" 

-- 

"Yes, Your Honor. Now, where we are so far, in at least my
line of reasoning, is I want to walk the Court through enough of our
complaint to help the Court understand that IBM clearly did contribute a
lot of the Unix-related information into Linux. We just don't know what
it is." 

-- Kevin McBride SCO vs. IBM 12/05/03




[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux