This seems to make alot of sense. While I'm still not thrilled about the existance of those docs, your comments sound very reasonable and have helped me put things in perspective. Thank you, Adam Kosmin " " It would /not/ be appropriate, given Objective #2, to attempt to bundle " such software /with/ Fedora or to make it a part of the Fedora Project. But " if such software is out there, and one or more users need it, and those " users have chosen it over equivalent FOSS solutions or those solutions do " not yet exist, then by helping the user install it what we have gained is " another happy Fedora user. That's the user's right to freedom of choice, " and one more convert for Fedora... win-win for all involved. " " Simple. " " " -- " Rodolfo J. Paiz " rpaiz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx " http://www.simpaticus.com " " " -- " fedora-list mailing list " fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx " To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list " -- "Yes, Your Honor. Now, where we are so far, in at least my line of reasoning, is I want to walk the Court through enough of our complaint to help the Court understand that IBM clearly did contribute a lot of the Unix-related information into Linux. We just don't know what it is." -- Kevin McBride SCO vs. IBM 12/05/03
