Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]> writes:
> On 11/26, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>>
>> Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]> writes:
>>
>> > - set_special_pids(1, 1);
>> > + if (current->nsproxy != &init_nsproxy) {
>> > + get_nsproxy(&init_nsproxy);
>> > + switch_task_namespaces(current, &init_nsproxy);
>> > + }
>>
>> Is there a reason for moving this hunk of code?
>>
>> I don't see one as set_special_pids does everything with either
>> struct pid or global pid values. And attach_pid and detach_pid
>> don't care.
>
> No particular reason, except "keep related code together".
>
> There was another minor reason. Without the next patch we are doing find_pid(1).
> This is correct, we scan the global namespace, but still it looks a bit tidier
> to switch namespace first, so we could use find_vpid() in unlikely case we need
> it.
True. I just pointed it out because it seemed an unnecessary chunk.
Regardless it is harmless either way.
Acked-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <[email protected]>
Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
