Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]> writes:
> Change set_special_pids() to work with struct pid, not pid_t from global name
> space. This again speedups and imho cleanups the code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]>
Overall I like it, and the version I keep meaning to send missed
the fact we only need a single argument.
> -static void set_special_pids(pid_t session, pid_t pgrp)
> +static void set_special_pids(struct pid *pid)
> {
> write_lock_irq(&tasklist_lock);
> - __set_special_pids(session, pgrp);
> + __set_special_pids(pid);
> write_unlock_irq(&tasklist_lock);
> }
>
> @@ -385,7 +386,11 @@ void daemonize(const char *name, ...)
> */
> current->flags |= PF_NOFREEZE;
>
> - set_special_pids(1, 1);
> + if (current->nsproxy != &init_nsproxy) {
> + get_nsproxy(&init_nsproxy);
> + switch_task_namespaces(current, &init_nsproxy);
> + }
Is there a reason for moving this hunk of code?
I don't see one as set_special_pids does everything with either
struct pid or global pid values. And attach_pid and detach_pid
don't care.
Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
