Re: wrong order of arguments of ->readdir()

On Mon, Jul 16, 2007 at 01:44:24PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Today is not being a good day.
> 
> This bug was already fixed.   The following mistakes were made:
> 
> a) Jan's patch was misleadingly titled "coda: avoid lockdep warning in
>    coda_readdir"
> 
> b) Jan's patch had no changelog
> 
> c) Jen's patch was not cc'ed to any mailing list
 
... said patch (presumably being an obvious fix of obvious roothole)
had not been sent to mainline immediately.

> d) Al's patch was not sent to the maintainer.  Nor to me.  Nor was it
>    staged in any tree which I can get at so that I could inform people of
>    the upcoming conflict/duplication/etc.
 
Coda is still maintained?  That's certainly news to me - I'm not being
sarcastic, but my impression had been that coda got abandoned several
years ago.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: wrong order of arguments of ->readdir()
    • From: Jan Harkes <[email protected]>
  • Re: wrong order of arguments of ->readdir()
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: wrong order of arguments of ->readdir()
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] utime(s): Honour CAP_FOWNER when times==NULL
• Next by Date: [PATCH 01/02] USB: sierra: Add TRU-Install (c) Support [ATTEMPT 5]
• Previous by thread: Re: wrong order of arguments of ->readdir()
• Next by thread: Re: wrong order of arguments of ->readdir()
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]