Re: [PATCH] try parent numa_node at first before using default

On 7/12/07, Greg KH <[email protected]> wrote:

But you were not able to test USB, right?  Does that work properly now
with this patch?

Will test it later with USB cdrom by big file reading.

YH
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Re: [PATCH 1/5] try parent numa_node at first before using default
    • From: Stefan Richter <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 1/5] try parent numa_node at first before using default
    • From: Cornelia Huck <[email protected]>
  • [PATCH] try parent numa_node at first before using default
    • From: Yinghai Lu <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] try parent numa_node at first before using default
    • From: Greg KH <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] try parent numa_node at first before using default
    • From: "Yinghai Lu" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] try parent numa_node at first before using default
    • From: Greg KH <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: x86 status was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
• Next by Date: Re: x86 status was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] try parent numa_node at first before using default
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] try parent numa_node at first before using default
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]