Re: Renice X for cpu schedulers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Nick Piggin wrote:
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 09:17:25AM -0400, Mark Lord wrote:
Just plain "make" (no -j2 or -j9999) is enough to kill interactivity
on my 2GHz P-M single-core non-HT machine with SD.

Is this with or without X reniced?

That was with no manual jiggling, everything the same as with stock kernels,
except that stock kernels don't kill interactivity here.

But with the very first posted version of CFS by Ingo,
I can do "make -j2" no problem and still have a nicely interactive destop.

How well does cfs run if you have the granularity set to something
like 30ms (30000000)?

Dunno, I've put this stuff aside for now until things settle down.
With four schedulers, and lots of patches / revisions / tuning-knobs,
there's just no way to keep up with it all here.

Cheers
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux