On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 09:17:25AM -0400, Mark Lord wrote:
> Con Kolivas wrote:
> s go ahead and think up great ideas for other ways of metering out cpu
> >bandwidth for different purposes, but for X, given the absurd simplicity
> >of renicing, why keep fighting it? Again I reiterate that most users of SD
> >have not found the need to renice X anyway except if they stick to old
> >habits of make -j4 on uniprocessor and the like, and I expect that those
> >on CFS and Nicksched would also have similar experiences.
>
> Just plain "make" (no -j2 or -j9999) is enough to kill interactivity
> on my 2GHz P-M single-core non-HT machine with SD.
Is this with or without X reniced?
> But with the very first posted version of CFS by Ingo,
> I can do "make -j2" no problem and still have a nicely interactive destop.
How well does cfs run if you have the granularity set to something
like 30ms (30000000)?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
