> Peter Williams wrote:
> >William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> >>I was tempted to restart from scratch given Ingo's comments, but I
> >>reconsidered and I'll be working with your code (and the German
> >>students' as well). If everything has to change, so be it, but it'll
> >>still be a derived work. It would be ignoring precedent and failure to
> >>properly attribute if I did otherwise.
> >
> >I can give you a patch (or set of patches) against the latest git
> >vanilla kernel version if that would help. There have been changes to
> >the vanilla scheduler code since 2.6.20 so the latest patch on
> >sourceforge won't apply cleanly. I've found that implementing this as a
> >series of patches rather than one big patch makes it easier fro me to
> >cope with changes to the underlying code.
>
On Wed, Apr 18, 2007 at 10:27:27AM +1000, Peter Williams wrote:
> I've just placed a single patch for plugsched against 2.6.21-rc7 updated
> to Linus's git tree as of an hour or two ago on sourceforge:
> <http://downloads.sourceforge.net/cpuse/plugsched-6.5-for-2.6.21-rc7.patch>
> This should at least enable you to get it to apply cleanly to the latest
> kernel sources. Let me know if you'd also like this as a quilt/mq
> friendly patch series?
A quilt-friendly series would be most excellent if you could arrange it.
Thanks.
-- wli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
