Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Emergency skbs should never touch user-space, however NF_QUEUE is fully user
> configurable. Notify the user of his mistake and try to continue.
>
> --- linux-2.6-git.orig/net/netfilter/core.c 2007-02-14 12:09:07.000000000 +0100
> +++ linux-2.6-git/net/netfilter/core.c 2007-02-14 12:09:18.000000000 +0100
> @@ -187,6 +187,11 @@ next_hook:
> kfree_skb(*pskb);
> ret = -EPERM;
> } else if ((verdict & NF_VERDICT_MASK) == NF_QUEUE) {
> + if (unlikely((*pskb)->emergency)) {
> + printk(KERN_ERR "nf_hook: NF_QUEUE encountered for "
> + "emergency skb - skipping rule.\n");
> + goto next_hook;
> + }
If I'm not mistaken any skb on the receive side might get
allocated from the reserve. I don't see how the user could
avoid this except by not using queueing at all.
I also didn't see a patch dropping packets allocated from
the reserve that are forwarded or processed directly without
getting queued to a socket, so this would allow them to
bypass userspace queueing and still go through.
I think the user should just exclude packets necessary for
swapping from queueing manually, based on IP addresses,
port numbers or something like that.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
