> > Inspired by Peter Staubach's patch and the resulting comments.
> >
> >
>
> An updated version of the original patch was submitted to LKML
> yesterday... :-)
Strange coincidence :)
> > file = vma->vm_file;
> > start = vma->vm_end;
> > + mapping_update_time(file);
> > if ((flags & MS_SYNC) && file &&
> > (vma->vm_flags & VM_SHARED)) {
> > get_file(file);
> >
>
> It seems to me that this might lead to file times being updated for
> non-MAP_SHARED mappings.
In theory no, because the COW-ed pages become anonymous and are not
part of the original mapping any more.
> > +int set_page_dirty_mapping(struct page *page);
> >
>
> This aspect of the design seems intrusive to me. I didn't see a strong
> reason to introduce new versions of many of the routines just to handle
> these semantics. What motivated this part of your design? Why the new
> _mapping versions of routines?
Because there's no way to know inside the set_page_dirty() functions
if the dirtying comes from a memory mapping or from a modification
through a normal write(). And they have different semantics, for
write() the modification times are updated immediately.
Thanks,
Miklos
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
