On Tue, 13 Feb 2007 09:37:38 +0200 Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 03:47:50PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
>
> > Now that most of the sizeof(array)/sizeof(array[0]) conversions have
> > been done (there are about 800 done and about another 130 left),
> > perhaps it could be useful to change the code to use a define
> > similar to the list_for_each
> >
> > #define list_for_each(pos, head) \
> > for (pos = (head)->next; prefetch(pos->next), pos != (head); \
> > pos = pos->next)
> >
> > perhaps
> >
> > #define array_for_each(index, array) \
> > for ((index) = 0; (index) < ARRAY_SIZE((array)); (index)++)
>
> Could we please stop "improving" the C language? it has served us fine
> so far.
I'm with Muli. The open-coded for loop is fine (using ARRAY_SIZE).
---
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
