In article <1171324070.1528.25.camel@localhost> (at Mon, 12 Feb 2007 15:47:50 -0800), Joe Perches <[email protected]> says:
> Now that most of the sizeof(array)/sizeof(array[0])
> conversions have been done (there are about 800 done
> and about another 130 left), perhaps it could be
> useful to change the code to use a define similar
> to the list_for_each
>
> #define list_for_each(pos, head) \
> for (pos = (head)->next; prefetch(pos->next), pos != (head); \
> pos = pos->next)
>
> perhaps
>
> #define array_for_each(index, array) \
> for ((index) = 0; (index) < ARRAY_SIZE((array)); (index)++)
I dislike this; it is overkill.
list_for_each etc. are for list_head etc., of structures.
On the other hand, arrays are not.
It is very, very obvious how to access its members.
--yoshfuji
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
