Re: unfixed regression in 2.6.20-rc6 (since 2.6.19)

Greg KH <[email protected]> writes:
> On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 03:30:22PM +0100, Rainer Weikusat wrote:

[...]

>> If you want to fix it only if you can claim to have written the code,
>> fine.
>
> I do not claim I have rewritten the code, if you look, you get full
> authorship credit for this fix, I just say I restructured it a bit.

You have rewritten it to match set of popular beliefs I consider to be
misguided. This means _you_ are the author of this code and all I can
to is to basically accept that you have the power to force your
beliefs on others and I haven't. So be it. Could this be the end of
this useless discussion?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • unfixed regression in 2.6.20-rc6 (since 2.6.19)
    • From: Rainer Weikusat <[email protected]>
  • Re: unfixed regression in 2.6.20-rc6 (since 2.6.19)
    • From: Greg KH <[email protected]>
  • Re: unfixed regression in 2.6.20-rc6 (since 2.6.19)
    • From: Rainer Weikusat <[email protected]>
  • Re: unfixed regression in 2.6.20-rc6 (since 2.6.19)
    • From: Greg KH <[email protected]>
  • Re: unfixed regression in 2.6.20-rc6 (since 2.6.19)
    • From: Rainer Weikusat <[email protected]>
  • Re: unfixed regression in 2.6.20-rc6 (since 2.6.19)
    • From: Oleg Verych <[email protected]>
  • Re: unfixed regression in 2.6.20-rc6 (since 2.6.19)
    • From: Greg KH <[email protected]>
  • Re: unfixed regression in 2.6.20-rc6 (since 2.6.19)
    • From: Rainer Weikusat <[email protected]>
  • Re: unfixed regression in 2.6.20-rc6 (since 2.6.19)
    • From: Greg KH <[email protected]>
  • Re: unfixed regression in 2.6.20-rc6 (since 2.6.19)
    • From: Rainer Weikusat <[email protected]>
  • Re: unfixed regression in 2.6.20-rc6 (since 2.6.19)
    • From: Greg KH <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [patches] [PATCH 2.6.21 review I] [4/25] x86: kernel-mode faults pollute current->thead
• Next by Date: Re: [IA64] swiotlb abstraction (e.g. for Xen)
• Previous by thread: Re: unfixed regression in 2.6.20-rc6 (since 2.6.19)
• Next by thread: [PATCH 2.6.20-rc6][MIPS]Malta: trivial compile error fix
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]