Re: [PATCH 6/7] containers (V7): BeanCounters over generic process containers

On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 12:15:27AM -0800, [email protected] wrote:
> This patch implements the BeanCounter resource control abstraction
> over generic process containers. 

Forgive my confusion, but do we really need two-levels of resource control 
abstraction here? Why can't resource controllers directly work with containers 
(just like cpu accounting does)?

-- 
Regards,
vatsa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH 6/7] containers (V7): BeanCounters over generic process containers
    • From: "Paul Menage" <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH 0/7] containers (V7): Generic Process Containers
    • From: [email protected]
  • [PATCH 6/7] containers (V7): BeanCounters over generic process containers
    • From: [email protected]

• Prev by Date: Re: [take35 0/10] kevent: Generic event handling mechanism.
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 3/7] containers (V7): Add generic multi-subsystem API to containers
• Previous by thread: [PATCH 6/7] containers (V7): BeanCounters over generic process containers
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 6/7] containers (V7): BeanCounters over generic process containers
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]