Re: [take35 0/10] kevent: Generic event handling mechanism.

Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
> I think that mean that everybody is happy with APi, design and set of
> features. 

No comment means that I still have not been able to test anything since
regardless of what version I tried, it failed to build.

-- 
➧ Ulrich Drepper ➧ Red Hat, Inc. ➧ 444 Castro St ➧ Mountain View, CA ❖

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [take35 0/10] kevent: Generic event handling mechanism.
    • From: Evgeniy Polyakov <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [take35 0/10] kevent: Generic event handling mechanism.
    • From: Evgeniy Polyakov <[email protected]>
  • Re: [take35 0/10] kevent: Generic event handling mechanism.
    • From: Evgeniy Polyakov <[email protected]>
  • Re: [take35 0/10] kevent: Generic event handling mechanism.
    • From: Evgeniy Polyakov <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 3/7] containers (V7): Add generic multi-subsystem API to containers
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 6/7] containers (V7): BeanCounters over generic process containers
• Previous by thread: Re: [take35 0/10] kevent: Generic event handling mechanism.
• Next by thread: Re: [take35 0/10] kevent: Generic event handling mechanism.
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]