Re: [PATCH 1/10] lguest: Don't rely on last-linked fallthru when no paravirt handler

On Friday 09 February 2007 10:14, Rusty Russell wrote:

> +unhandled_paravirt:
> +	/* Nothing wanted us: try to die with dignity (impossible trap). */ 
> +	movl	$0x1F, %edx
> +	pushl	$0
> +	jmp	early_fault

Please print a real message with early_printk


-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH 1/10] lguest: Don't rely on last-linked fallthru when no paravirt handler
    • From: Rusty Russell <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH 0/10] lguest
    • From: Rusty Russell <[email protected]>
  • [PATCH 1/10] lguest: Don't rely on last-linked fallthru when no paravirt handler
    • From: Rusty Russell <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.21
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 2/10] lguest: Export symbols for lguest as a module
• Previous by thread: [PATCH 11/10] lguest: use disable_acpi()
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/10] lguest: Don't rely on last-linked fallthru when no paravirt handler
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]