On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 03:35:34PM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
[]
> there's a difference between NACKing my changes because the patch
> breaks things versus because you think the whole system should be
> taking some other form.
After all, i was giving negative acknowledgement to only-good-branch
orientation of the patch, and ease of having current script working by
setting up *your* environment. Try to Cc one of maintainers of archs,
where this script is used, to have positive ack.
> so if you dont like the mkuboot.sh script, fine, have at it with
> rewriting the system ... otherwise the patch i proposed should
> continue on for inclusion.
Goodbye.
____
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
