On 2/8/07, Oleg Verych <[email protected]> wrote:
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 09:28:03AM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On 2/8/07, Oleg Verych <[email protected]> wrote:
> >proposition is to substitute:
> > "$(CONFIG_SHELL) $(MKIMAGE)"
> >with
> > "mkimage"
>
> this isnt a one-to-one change ... let's look at the typical
> mkimage-missing scenario ...
You are interested in presents of `mkimage', but yet we discussing its
missing, or "Error -> Don't care" behavior.
i'm interested in having the system work for the Blackfin port and
that's it. if people want to redefine the current standard of how
u-boot images are generated, then go for it and get the approval of
all the existing arches.
there's a difference between NACKing my changes because the patch
breaks things versus because you think the whole system should be
taking some other form.
so if you dont like the mkuboot.sh script, fine, have at it with
rewriting the system ... otherwise the patch i proposed should
continue on for inclusion.
-mike
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
