Re: [patch 0/9] buffered write deadlock fix

On Fri, Feb 02, 2007 at 03:52:32PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Bugfixes come first, so I will drop readahead and fsaio and git-block to get
> this work completed if needed - please work agaisnt mainline.

OK with readahead.

There are too much fixes in the series.  I'd like to fold them up and
update some change logs. And then there would be one more update.

Regards,
Wu
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [patch 0/9] buffered write deadlock fix
    • From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch 0/9] buffered write deadlock fix
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [ANN] Userspace M-on-N threading model implementation. Alpha release.
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Char: add __devinitdata to pci_device_ids
• Previous by thread: Re: [patch 0/9] buffered write deadlock fix
• Next by thread: [patch 0/9] buffered write deadlock fix
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]