Re: [ANN] Userspace M-on-N threading model implementation. Alpha release.

> Because user threading can avoid context switches, there will always be 
> cases where it will outperform o/s threads for hardware reasons.

actually.. switching from one "real" thread to another in Linux is not
an actual context switch in the hardware sense... at least this part of
your argument seems to be incorrect ;)

> 
-- 
if you want to mail me at work (you don't), use arjan (at) linux.intel.com
Test the interaction between Linux and your BIOS via http://www.linuxfirmwarekit.org

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [ANN] Userspace M-on-N threading model implementation. Alpha release.
    • From: Bill Davidsen <[email protected]>

• References:
  • RE: [ANN] Userspace M-on-N threading model implementation. Alpha release.
    • From: "Kaz Kylheku" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [ANN] Userspace M-on-N threading model implementation. Alpha release.
    • From: Bill Davidsen <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Some process went UNINTERRUPTABLE forever.
• Next by Date: Re: [patch 0/9] buffered write deadlock fix
• Previous by thread: Re: [ANN] Userspace M-on-N threading model implementation. Alpha release.
• Next by thread: Re: [ANN] Userspace M-on-N threading model implementation. Alpha release.
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]