Re: [patch 00/46] High resolution timer / dynamic tick update

On Mon, 2007-01-29 at 13:31 -0800, john stultz wrote:
> Should I just revive the old 2.6.20-rc4-mm1 patches against your current
> tree and re-submit? Or should the HRT bits get settled first?

Thomas just pointed out that I had missed that the bits are back in
-mm2.

Sorry for the noise.
-john


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [patch 00/46] High resolution timer / dynamic tick update
    • From: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch 00/46] High resolution timer / dynamic tick update
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch 00/46] High resolution timer / dynamic tick update
    • From: john stultz <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] slab.c ifdef reduction breaks build
• Next by Date: Re: slab: start_cpu_timer/cache_reap CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU problems
• Previous by thread: Re: [patch 00/46] High resolution timer / dynamic tick update
• Next by thread: [PATCH 1/2]: Fix BUG in cancel_dirty_pages on XFS
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]