On Sat, 2007-01-27 at 18:17 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Jan 2007 22:00:55 -0000
> Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > This is a full replacement queue for the high resolution timer / dynamic
> > ticks implemementation in -mm.
>
> The Vaio broke again. Seems to hang permanently the first time it tries to
> sleep. The cursor doesn't flash. Adding "clock=pit" doesn't fix it. I'm
> disinclined to bisect it since the patch series fails to compile at
> practically all bisections points.
>
> I'll drop all the patches, which means I drop John's vsyscall patches and
> his x86_64 conversion as well.
"He's got a bug!"
What's his bug got to do with me?
"He's got a bug!"
I ain't trying to hear that, see?
But seriously (the above might be too obscure of a reference :), my
x86_64 GTOD patches were against vanilla and were not dependent on the
HRT patches. There were a few merge/fixup patches in your tree, but I
don't recall many of them being really interleaved w/ the HRT code. I'm
I missing or forgetting some bit?
Should I just revive the old 2.6.20-rc4-mm1 patches against your current
tree and re-submit? Or should the HRT bits get settled first?
"ain't no future in fronting"
-john
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
