On Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 03:18:41PM +0000, Alan wrote:
> On Sun, 21 Jan 2007 20:13:00 +0100
> Adrian Bunk <email@example.com> wrote:
> > Using assembler code for performance in drivers might have been a good
> > idea 15 years ago when this code was written, but with today's compilers
> > that's unlikely to be an advantage.
> > Besides this, it also hurts the readability.
> > Simply use the C code that was already there as an alternative.
> > Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> The C codepaths are essentially untested on this driver.
Has any part of this driver ever be tested with kernel 2.6?
Or compiled with gcc 4?
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to email@example.com
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]