Re: [PATCH] Introduce simple TRUE and FALSE boolean macros.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Robert P. J. Day wrote:

by adding (temporarily) the definitions of TRUE and FALSE to types.h,
you should then (theoretically) be able to delete over 100 instances
of those same macros being *defined* throughout the source tree.
you're not going to be deleting the hundreds and hundreds of *uses* of
TRUE and FALSE (not yet, anyway) but, at the very least, by adding two
lines to types.h, you can delete all those redundant *definitions* and
make sure that nothing breaks.  (it shouldn't, of course, but it's
always nice to be sure.)

Doesn't seem very worthwhile, and it legitimises this definition we're
trying to get rid of.

*now*, once that's done, you can start going through the tree and
doing the conversion from upper case to lower case, little by little,
subsystem by subsystem.

I don't see why your patch is needed before the individual conversions?

the predictable response will be, "you really should do that all at
once."

You don't need to do it all at once.

--
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com -
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux