Re: [PATCH] Introduce simple TRUE and FALSE boolean macros.

On Sun, 2007-01-21 at 05:03 -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>   Introduce the TRUE and FALSE boolean macros so that everyone can
> stop re-inventing them, and remove the one occurrence in the source
> tree that clashes with that change.
> 

If you're going to introduce true and false macros, you should probably
use the official all-lowercase C99 version.

-- 
Nicholas Miell <[email protected]>

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] Introduce simple TRUE and FALSE boolean macros.
    • From: "Robert P. J. Day" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] Introduce simple TRUE and FALSE boolean macros.
    • From: Richard Knutsson <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH] Introduce simple TRUE and FALSE boolean macros.
    • From: "Robert P. J. Day" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: SATA exceptions with 2.6.20-rc5
• Next by Date: Re: SATA exceptions with 2.6.20-rc5
• Previous by thread: [PATCH] Introduce simple TRUE and FALSE boolean macros.
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Introduce simple TRUE and FALSE boolean macros.
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]