On Fri, 2007-01-19 at 11:51 -0500, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> > So with that out of the way I now have this
>
> Looks much better. Just one obvious buglet...
> > @@ -1565,6 +1579,23 @@ int __init nfs_init_writepagecache(void)
> > if (nfs_commit_mempool == NULL)
> > return -ENOMEM;
> >
> > + /*
> > + * NFS congestion size, scale with available memory.
> > + *
> > + * 64MB: 8192k
> > + * 128MB: 11585k
> > + * 256MB: 16384k
> > + * 512MB: 23170k
> > + * 1GB: 32768k
> > + * 2GB: 46340k
> > + * 4GB: 65536k
> > + * 8GB: 92681k
> > + * 16GB: 131072k
> > + *
> > + * This allows larger machines to have larger/more transfers.
> > + */
> > + nfs_congestion_size = 32*int_sqrt(totalram_pages);
> > +
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ nfs_congestion_pages?
Ah, yeah, forgot to refresh the patch one last time before sending
out :-(.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
