Re: Possible ways of dealing with OOM conditions.

On Thu, 18 Jan 2007, Peter Zijlstra wrote:

> 
> > Cache misses for small packet flow due to the fact, that the same data
> > is allocated and freed  and accessed on different CPUs will become an
> > issue soon, not right now, since two-four core CPUs are not yet to be
> > very popular and price for the cache miss is not _that_ high.
> 
> SGI does networking too, right?

Sslab deals with those issues the right way. We have per processor
queues that attempt to keep the cache hot state. A special shared queue
exists between neighboring processors to facilitate exchange of objects
between then.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Re: [PATCH 9/9] net: vm deadlock avoidance core
    • From: Evgeniy Polyakov <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 9/9] net: vm deadlock avoidance core
    • From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 9/9] net: vm deadlock avoidance core
    • From: Evgeniy Polyakov <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 9/9] net: vm deadlock avoidance core
    • From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 9/9] net: vm deadlock avoidance core
    • From: Evgeniy Polyakov <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 9/9] net: vm deadlock avoidance core
    • From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 9/9] net: vm deadlock avoidance core
    • From: Evgeniy Polyakov <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 9/9] net: vm deadlock avoidance core
    • From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
  • Possible ways of dealing with OOM conditions.
    • From: Evgeniy Polyakov <[email protected]>
  • Re: Possible ways of dealing with OOM conditions.
    • From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
  • Re: Possible ways of dealing with OOM conditions.
    • From: Evgeniy Polyakov <[email protected]>
  • Re: Possible ways of dealing with OOM conditions.
    • From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] Stop making "inline" imply forced inlining.
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] nfs: fix congestion control
• Previous by thread: Re: Possible ways of dealing with OOM conditions.
• Next by thread: [PATCH 3/9] mm: allow PF_MEMALLOC from softirq context
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]