Re: PATCH - x86-64 signed-compare bug, was Re: select() setting ERESTARTNOHAND (514).

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thursday 11 January 2007 02:02, Neil Brown wrote:
> If regs->rax is unsigned long, then I would think the compiler would
> be allowed to convert
> 
>    switch (regs->rax) {
> 	case -514 : whatever;
>    }
> 
> to a no-op, as regs->rax will never have a negative value.

In C, you never actually compare different types. They always
promoted to some common type first.

both sides of (impicit) == here get promoted to "biggest" integer,
in this case, to unsigned long. "-514" is an int, so it gets
sign extended to the width of "long" and then converted to
unsigned long.
--
vda
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux