On Thursday January 11, [email protected] wrote:
> > Just a 'me too' at this point.
> > The X server on my shiny new notebook (Core 2 Duo) occasionally dies
> > with 'select' repeatedly returning ERESTARTNOHAND. It is most
> > annoying!
>
> Normally it should be only visible in strace. Did you see it without
> strace?
No, only in strace.
>
> >
> > You don't mention in the Email which kernel version you use but I see
> > from the web page you reference it is 2.6.19.1. I'm using
> > 2.6.18.something.
> >
> > I thought I'd have a quick look at the code, comparing i386 to x86-64
> > and guess what I found.....
> >
> > On x86-64, regs->rax is "unsigned long", so the following is
> > needed....
>
> regs->rax is unsigned long.
> I don't think your patch will make any difference. What do you think
> it will change?
If regs->rax is unsigned long, then I would think the compiler would
be allowed to convert
switch (regs->rax) {
case -514 : whatever;
}
to a no-op, as regs->rax will never have a negative value.
However it appears that the current compiler doesn't make that
optimisation so I guess I was too hasty.
Still, I think it would be safer to have the cast, in case the compiler
decided to be clever.... or does the C standard ensure against that?
Sorry for the noise,
NeilBrown
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
