>>> Andrew Morton <[email protected]> 09.01.07 23:04 >>>
>On Tue, 9 Jan 2007 12:01:21 +0100
>Andi Kleen <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On Tuesday 09 January 2007 03:55, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>> > RESTORE_CONTEXT lost a newline in
>> > commit 658fdbef66e5e9be79b457edc2cbbb3add840aa9:
>> > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg00559.html
>>
>> I don't think we should add such changes for external patchkits.
>>
>> In general kgdb shouldn't add any patches at all. If the existing
>> hooks are not enough they should submit their changes needed so
>> that it can just work.
>>
>
>But the patch is a bugfix. Without it, you cannot do
>
> RESTORE_CONTEXT \
> .globl ... \
Their use was broken in the first place - they shouldn't have made
assumptions about the contents of the macro, by writing this like
RESTORE_CONTEXT "\n\t" \
".globl ..." \
if they really need to make use of the macro. This is similar to
requirements of other (assembly) macros that normally also
don't have a line terminator and hence require the users to
add appropriate line termination after the macro name (and
eventual arguments).
I would even go as far as asking for removing the \n\t on SAVE_CONTEXT
and the left \t on RESTORE_CONTEXT.
Jan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
