On Tue, 9 Jan 2007 12:01:21 +0100
Andi Kleen <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 09 January 2007 03:55, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > RESTORE_CONTEXT lost a newline in
> > commit 658fdbef66e5e9be79b457edc2cbbb3add840aa9:
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg00559.html
>
> I don't think we should add such changes for external patchkits.
>
> In general kgdb shouldn't add any patches at all. If the existing
> hooks are not enough they should submit their changes needed so
> that it can just work.
>
But the patch is a bugfix. Without it, you cannot do
RESTORE_CONTEXT \
.globl ... \
Was the addition of this restriction to RESTORE_CONTEXT deliberate, or
mistaken?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
