Re: Gaming Interface

On Tue, 09 Jan 2007 11:08:57 EST, Lennart Sorensen said:
> Why not start by suggesting using standard api's instead when writing
> the original game engine.  That would make porting it easier later.
> DirectX is not a standard api.

When it's installed on 95% of the computers, it's a de-facto standard. 

Attachment: pgp0UVNynFZMN.pgp
Description: PGP signature

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Gaming Interface
    • From: [email protected] (Lennart Sorensen)

• References:
  • Gaming Interface
    • From: Dirk <[email protected]>
  • Re: Gaming Interface
    • From: "Trent Waddington" <[email protected]>
  • Re: Gaming Interface
    • From: Dirk <[email protected]>
  • Re: Gaming Interface
    • From: Dirk <[email protected]>
  • Re: Gaming Interface
    • From: Helge Hafting <[email protected]>
  • Re: Gaming Interface
    • From: Dirk <[email protected]>
  • Re: Gaming Interface
    • From: Jan Dittmer <[email protected]>
  • Re: Gaming Interface
    • From: Dirk <[email protected]>
  • Re: Gaming Interface
    • From: "Trent Waddington" <[email protected]>
  • Re: Gaming Interface
    • From: [email protected] (Lennart Sorensen)

• Prev by Date: Re: SATA/IDE Dual Mode w/Intel 945 Chipset or HOW TO LIQUIFY a flash IDE chip under 2.6.18
• Next by Date: Re: REGRESSION: 2.6.20-rc3-git4: EIO not returned to direct i/o application following disk error
• Previous by thread: Re: Gaming Interface
• Next by thread: Re: Gaming Interface
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]