On Jan 8 2007 00:02, dean gaudet wrote:
>On Fri, 5 Jan 2007, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>> On Jan 4 2007 17:48, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> >
>> >[i386] All Transmeta CPUs have constant TSCs
>> >All Transmeta CPUs ever produced have constant-rate TSCs.
>>
>> A TSC is ticking according to the CPU frequency, is not it?
>
>transmeta decided years before intel and amd that a constant rate tsc
>(unaffected by P-state) was the only sane choice. on transmeta cpus the
>tsc increments at the maximum cpu frequency no matter what the P-state
>(and no matter what longrun is doing behind the kernel's back).
>
>mind you, many people thought this was a crazy choice at the time...
>
Well it defeats the purpose of TSC. I mean, they could have kept the "TSC" and
instead added a second TSC ticker, constant_tsc.
-`J'
--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
