On Thu, Jan 04, 2007 at 09:36:36PM +0000, Richard Hughes wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-01-04 at 13:28 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Thu, 4 Jan 2007 22:18:30 +0100
> > Mattia Dongili <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > > The place to start (please) is the patches in -mm:
> > > >
> > > > 2.6-sony_acpi4.patch
> > > > sony_apci-resume.patch
> > > > sony_apci-resume-fix.patch
> > > > acpi-add-backlight-support-to-the-sony_acpi.patch
> > > > acpi-add-backlight-support-to-the-sony_acpi-v2.patch
> > > > video-sysfs-support-take-2-add-dev-argument-for-backlight_device_register-sony_acpi-fix.patch
> > > >
> > > > It presently has both the /proc and /sys/.../backlight/.. interfaces, so the first
> > > > job would be to chop out the /proc stuff.
> > >
> > > Ok, I'll import all of them and start from there.
> > > Is it ok to wipe all the /proc stuff without notice?
> >
> > spose so. I don't know if any apps are dependent upon the /proc file,
> > but the driver isn't in mainline yet so it's unlikely that there's a
> > mountain of software depending upon existing interfaces.
>
> Well, HAL has used it for changing the brightness for the last year or
> so: /proc/acpi/sony/brightness
>
> Although if you use a new enough HAL (CVS), the laptop will be supported
> via the shiny new backlight class.
great, -mm already has the /sys/class/backlight in place for sony_acpi
and I suppose the /proc entry can be kept until 2.6.20 is released, i.e.
just before pushing things for .21.
Len, would you allow it?
--
mattia
:wq!
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
