Re: [2.6 patch] net/irda/: proper prototypes

From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 13:45:57 +0100

> On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 12:39:53AM -0800, David Miller wrote:
> > I don't like it, even if it's "correct", because it is inconsistent
> > with what we do in the entire rest of the networking code.
> 
> Good point.
> 
> Is it OK to slowly starting converting them or do you want them to stay?

If I saw some value in it I'd say to convert, but I don't so
I'd say let's keep them the way they are.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Re: [2.6 patch] net/irda/: proper prototypes
    • From: David Miller <[email protected]>
  • Re: [2.6 patch] net/irda/: proper prototypes
    • From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] libata: fix combined mode (was Re: Happy New Year (and v2.6.20-rc3 released))
• Next by Date: [PATCH] Sanely size hash tables when using large base pages. take 2.
• Previous by thread: Re: [2.6 patch] net/irda/: proper prototypes
• Next by thread: Re: selinux networking: sleeping functin called from invalid context in 2.6.20-rc[12]
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]