Re: [PATCH -rt] Don't let raise_softirq_prio lower the prio (was: [RT] rt priority losing)

* Steven Rostedt <[email protected]> wrote:

> I guess the simple fix is not to allow the interrupt to lower the 
> priority. But simple fixes do not always handle all the cases.
> 
> Thomas G., see any side effects with this patch?
> 
> -- Steve
> 
> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>

thanks, applied. Thomas, fine with you too?

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [RT] rt priority losing
    • From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RT] rt priority losing
    • From: Esben Nielsen <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RT] rt priority losing
    • From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RT] rt priority losing
    • From: Esben Nielsen <[email protected]>
  • [PATCH -rt] Don't let raise_softirq_prio lower the prio (was: [RT] rt priority losing)
    • From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] TIF_NOTSC and SECCOMP prctl
• Next by Date: Re: [NFS] [PATCH] [nfsd] Add lock annotations to e_start and e_stop
• Previous by thread: [PATCH -rt] Don't let raise_softirq_prio lower the prio (was: [RT] rt priority losing)
• Next by thread: Re: [ANNOUNCE][RFC] PlugSched-6.4 for 2.6.18-rc2
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]