Re: [PATCH] TIF_NOTSC and SECCOMP prctl

* [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote:

> Here a repost of the last seccomp patch against current mainline 
> including the preempt fix. This changes the seccomp API from 
> /proc/<pid>/seccomp to a prctl (this will produce a smaller kernel) 
> and it adds a TIF_NOTSC that seccomp sets. Only the current task can 
> call disable_TSC (obviously because it hasn't a task_t param). This 
> includes Chuck's patch to give zero runtime cost to the notsc feature.

please send a patch-queue that is properly split-up: the bugfix, the API 
change and the TIF_NOTSC improvement.

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] TIF_NOTSC and SECCOMP prctl
    • From: [email protected]

• References:
  • Re: [PATCH] TIF_NOTSC and SECCOMP prctl
    • From: Chuck Ebbert <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] TIF_NOTSC and SECCOMP prctl
    • From: [email protected]
  • Re: [PATCH] TIF_NOTSC and SECCOMP prctl
    • From: [email protected]

• Prev by Date: [BUG] usb: device unconnect cause oops
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH -rt] Don't let raise_softirq_prio lower the prio (was: [RT] rt priority losing)
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] TIF_NOTSC and SECCOMP prctl
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] TIF_NOTSC and SECCOMP prctl
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]