RE: Fix unlock_buffer() to work the same way as bit_unlock()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 29 Mar 2006, Boehm, Hans wrote:

> Somewhat improved slides for the talk Grant is referring to are at
> http://www.hpl.hp.com/personal/Hans_Boehm/misc_slides/pldi05_threads.pdf

Hmm.. A paper on that subject would be better. Cannot get much from the 
slides.

> It's hard to get this stuff right.  But we knew that.

Could you come up with a proposal how to correctly define and API to bit 
ops in such a way that they work for all architectures and allow us to 
utilize all the features that processors may have?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux