Re: [ck] [benchmark] Interbench 2.6.16-ck/mm

On Saturday 25 March 2006 19:21, Radoslaw Szkodzinski wrote:
> On Saturday 25 March 2006 05:01, Con Kolivas wrote yet:
> > I don't expect that staircase will be better in every single situation.
> > However it will be better more often, especially when it counts (like
> > audio or video skipping) and far more predictable. All that in 300 lines
> > less code :)
>
> I thinks the main difference is those other scheduler improvements.
> Some of them are compatible with staircase.
> Could you also try a mixed and matched 2.6.16-ck1+mm?

You're kidding, right? Check the code.

Cheers,
Con
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [ck] [benchmark] Interbench 2.6.16-ck/mm
    • From: Radoslaw Szkodzinski <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [benchmark] Interbench 2.6.16-ck/mm
    • From: Con Kolivas <[email protected]>
  • Re: [ck] [benchmark] Interbench 2.6.16-ck/mm
    • From: Con Kolivas <[email protected]>
  • Re: [ck] [benchmark] Interbench 2.6.16-ck/mm
    • From: Radoslaw Szkodzinski <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [PATCH 2.6.16-mm1 1/2] sched_domain: handle kmalloc failure
• Next by Date: [PATCH 2.6.16-mm1 2/2] sched_domains: Allocate sched_groups dynamically
• Previous by thread: Re: [ck] [benchmark] Interbench 2.6.16-ck/mm
• Next by thread: Re: [ck] [benchmark] Interbench 2.6.16-ck/mm
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]