Re: [ck] [benchmark] Interbench 2.6.16-ck/mm

On Saturday 25 March 2006 05:01, Con Kolivas wrote yet:
>
> I don't expect that staircase will be better in every single situation.
> However it will be better more often, especially when it counts (like audio
> or video skipping) and far more predictable. All that in 300 lines less
> code :)
>

I thinks the main difference is those other scheduler improvements.
Some of them are compatible with staircase.
Could you also try a mixed and matched 2.6.16-ck1+mm?

-- 
GPG Key id:  0xD1F10BA2
Fingerprint: 96E2 304A B9C4 949A 10A0  9105 9543 0453 D1F1 0BA2

AstralStorm

Attachment: pgp86cUXPEf2s.pgp
Description: PGP signature

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [ck] [benchmark] Interbench 2.6.16-ck/mm
    • From: Con Kolivas <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [benchmark] Interbench 2.6.16-ck/mm
    • From: Con Kolivas <[email protected]>
  • Re: [ck] [benchmark] Interbench 2.6.16-ck/mm
    • From: "André Goddard Rosa" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [ck] [benchmark] Interbench 2.6.16-ck/mm
    • From: Con Kolivas <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.16 hugetlbfs problem - DEBUG_PAGEALLOC
• Next by Date: [PATCH 2.6.16-mm1 1/2] sched_domain: handle kmalloc failure
• Previous by thread: Re: [ck] [benchmark] Interbench 2.6.16-ck/mm
• Next by thread: Re: [ck] [benchmark] Interbench 2.6.16-ck/mm
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]