jamal wrote:
On Mon, 2006-13-03 at 18:33 -0800, Matt Helsley wrote:
On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 19:56 -0500, Shailabh Nagar wrote:
Jamal, was your Mon, 13 Mar 2006 21:29:09 -0500 reply:
Note, you are still not following the standard scheme of doing things.
Example: using command = GET and the message carrying the TGID to note
which TGID is of interest. Instead you have command = TGID.
meant to suggest that TASKSTATS_CMD_(P|TG)ID should be renamed to
TASKSTATS_CMD_GET_(P|TG)ID ? Is that sufficient? Or am I
misunderstanding?
I had a long description in an earlier email feedback; but the summary
of it is the GET command is generic like TASKSTATS_CMD_GET; the message
itself carries TLVs of what needs to be gotten which are
either PID and/or TGID etc. Anyways, theres a long spill of what i am
saying in that earlier email. Perhaps the current patch is a transition
towards that?
Yes, the comments you'd made in the previous mail have not been
incorporated and this is still the older version of the patch.
We'd been avoiding TLV usage so far :-)
cheers,
jamal
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
