On Mon, 2006-13-03 at 18:33 -0800, Matt Helsley wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 19:56 -0500, Shailabh Nagar wrote:
> Jamal, was your Mon, 13 Mar 2006 21:29:09 -0500 reply:
> > Note, you are still not following the standard scheme of doing things.
> > Example: using command = GET and the message carrying the TGID to note
> > which TGID is of interest. Instead you have command = TGID.
> >
> meant to suggest that TASKSTATS_CMD_(P|TG)ID should be renamed to
> TASKSTATS_CMD_GET_(P|TG)ID ? Is that sufficient? Or am I
> misunderstanding?
>
I had a long description in an earlier email feedback; but the summary
of it is the GET command is generic like TASKSTATS_CMD_GET; the message
itself carries TLVs of what needs to be gotten which are
either PID and/or TGID etc. Anyways, theres a long spill of what i am
saying in that earlier email. Perhaps the current patch is a transition
towards that?
cheers,
jamal
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
