> > But wouldn't all sysctls potentially sleep (on account of copying data from > > the user). > > .. I'm not the one saying the BKL was useful... you were ;) My tiny mind must have been confused by the presence of the code, which I presumed would be useful. I guess that is not the case always :-) Balbir - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [Patch 0/7] Per-task delay accounting
- From: Shailabh Nagar <[email protected]>
- [Patch 1/7] timespec diff utility
- From: Shailabh Nagar <[email protected]>
- [Patch 2/7] Add sysctl for schedstats
- From: Shailabh Nagar <[email protected]>
- Re: [Patch 2/7] Add sysctl for schedstats
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [Lse-tech] Re: [Patch 2/7] Add sysctl for schedstats
- From: Balbir Singh <[email protected]>
- Re: [Lse-tech] Re: [Patch 2/7] Add sysctl for schedstats
- From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
- Re: [Lse-tech] Re: [Patch 2/7] Add sysctl for schedstats
- From: Balbir Singh <[email protected]>
- Re: [Lse-tech] Re: [Patch 2/7] Add sysctl for schedstats
- From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
- [Patch 0/7] Per-task delay accounting
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: Fix mem= cmdline handling on arch/powerpc for !MULTIPLATFORM
- Next by Date: Re: 2.4.31 hangs, no information on console or serial port
- Previous by thread: Re: [Lse-tech] Re: [Patch 2/7] Add sysctl for schedstats
- Next by thread: Re: [Patch 2/7] Add sysctl for schedstats
- Index(es):
 |