Re: [Lse-tech] Re: [Patch 2/7] Add sysctl for schedstats

On Mon, 2006-02-27 at 17:59 +0530, Balbir Singh wrote:
> > your sysctl functions sleep. the BKL is useless in the light of sleeping
> > code...
> >
> 
> But wouldn't all sysctls potentially sleep (on account of copying data from
> the user).

.. I'm not the one saying the BKL was useful... you were ;)


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [Lse-tech] Re: [Patch 2/7] Add sysctl for schedstats
    • From: Balbir Singh <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [Patch 0/7] Per-task delay accounting
    • From: Shailabh Nagar <[email protected]>
  • [Patch 1/7] timespec diff utility
    • From: Shailabh Nagar <[email protected]>
  • [Patch 2/7] Add sysctl for schedstats
    • From: Shailabh Nagar <[email protected]>
  • Re: [Patch 2/7] Add sysctl for schedstats
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  • Re: [Lse-tech] Re: [Patch 2/7] Add sysctl for schedstats
    • From: Balbir Singh <[email protected]>
  • Re: [Lse-tech] Re: [Patch 2/7] Add sysctl for schedstats
    • From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
  • Re: [Lse-tech] Re: [Patch 2/7] Add sysctl for schedstats
    • From: Balbir Singh <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: problems with scsi_transport_fc and qla2xxx
• Next by Date: Re: [Announce] Intel PRO/Wireless 3945ABG Network Connection
• Previous by thread: Re: [Lse-tech] Re: [Patch 2/7] Add sysctl for schedstats
• Next by thread: Re: [Lse-tech] Re: [Patch 2/7] Add sysctl for schedstats
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]