Re: [Lse-tech] Re: [Patch 4/7] Add sysctl for delay accounting

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> But if task enumeration is going to get more difficult, we'll need to 
> keep the on-demand allocation (on
> next use) as a backup for tasks that weren't caught during the sysctl 
> change.
>

One possible issue with on-demand allocation is that under heavy load
allocation causes IO to happen and when we try to timestamp that IO, we
do not have a delays structure to do so.

Balbir
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux