Re: [SCHED] wrong priority calc - SIMPLE test case

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 31 Dec 2005 17:37:11 +0100
Mike Galbraith <[email protected]> wrote:

> >"./a.out 200 & ./a.out 333"
> >
> >   PID USER      PR  NI  VIRT  RES  SHR S %CPU %MEM    TIME+  COMMAND
> >  5607 paolo     15   0  2396  320  252 R 56.1  0.1   0:06.79 a.out
> >  5606 paolo     15   0  2396  324  252 R 38.7  0.1   0:04.55 a.out
> >     1 root      16   0  2556  552  468 S  0.0  0.1   0:00.28 init
> 
> Strange.  Using the exact same arguments, I do see some odd bouncing up to 
> high priorities, but they spend the vast majority of their time down at 25.

You shouldn't use "the same exact numbers", you should try different
args and see if you can reproduce the problem. Or maybe preemption
make some difference... I'll try with PREEMPT enabled and see.

-- 
	Paolo Ornati
	Linux 2.6.15-rc7-plugsched on x86_64
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux